Can you think of an organization
that has implemented a ‘high risk strategy’ that has resulted in success (why
was it high risk at the time and why was it a success- was it good luck or good
judgment)?
As the term itself
suggests, “High risk strategy” can be very fruitful as well as dangerous for
any organization. Many organizations have implemented the “high risk strategy”,
and wall-mart is also one of them. ”High-risk strategy” resulted to be a
fruitful strategy for them.
Image source: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/04/20/timestopics/walmart.topic.395/walmart.topic.395-sfSpan.jpg
Image source: http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2007/04/20/timestopics/walmart.topic.395/walmart.topic.395-sfSpan.jpg
In 1962, Sam Walton
opened the very first store of wall-mart in Arkansas. It raised to a total of
25 stores in five years’ time and garnering a total revenue of USD 12.6
million. Under the CEO H Lee Scott Jr., wall-mart started to integrate its
business internationally too. As a result, Bharti wall-mart private limited was
announced by Bharti enterprises and wall-mart as their joint collaboration in
August 2007. Currently it is serving a market clients of 176 million every year
and has its stores quantity to 1800 with employees and associates more than 2
million and club setting in 15 markets.
It was a high risk
strategy at that moment because no one have had tried to serve products to the
consumers like wall-mart was willing to do. But, wall-mart rise as a perfect
example of “high-risk strategy” being a success. It was a case of good judgment
too. Why was “high-risk strategy” by wall-mark a success? And why it was a case
of good judgment can be found out with the help of below points:-
Wall-Mart
strategy (Which is Successful):
·
Bargaining power over suppliers.
·
Predicting demand for optimization of
cost.
·
Information Technology usage in all
business areas.
·
Getting new market opportunities through
world-wide expansion.
·
Supply-chain management and logistics
successful utilization.
·
In USA market, it is the largest
importer of Chinese consumer goods.
·
Very high operational efficiency.
·
Making same profits like other
competitors even by providing goods in 2-3 percent lower prices than others.
Partnership:
Partnership:
· Strategic partnership with various
Chinese firms and P & G for consultancies regarding sustainable business.
· Partnership with Environmental defense fund and CRM to implement sustainability in International business.
· Partnership with hospitals to earn goodwill that they can provide and speedily expand its stores.
· Partnership with Environmental defense fund and CRM to implement sustainability in International business.
· Partnership with hospitals to earn goodwill that they can provide and speedily expand its stores.
Vision
and Mission:
· Profit earning (huge) but also satisfying and maintaining customers.
· Profit earning (huge) but also satisfying and maintaining customers.
· To help the customers to maintain
quality of life and live better by saving the customers money.
· Providing goods and services from top quality groceries, school supplies to household items which are of low prices but best quality.
· Providing goods and services from top quality groceries, school supplies to household items which are of low prices but best quality.
Price is not the only
attribute that wall-mart excels on, but also selections, availability, quality
and on time delivery that their competitors cannot compete. Wall-mart Company
is now bigger than 160 nations with the revenue of USD 404.16 billion. This
tells us how successful this company is, and how well it implemented “high-risk
strategy”.
Now, do the same for an
organization who embarked in a high risk strategy that resulted in some sort of
failure (why was it high risk and why did it fail – bad luck or poor judgment)?
As the term itself
suggests, “High risk strategy” can be very fruitful as well as dangerous for
any organization. Many organizations have implemented the “high risk strategy”,
and British Broadcasting Corporation is also one of them. ”High-risk strategy”
resulted to be a failure for them.
British Broadcasting
Corporation is a British public service broadcasting corporation. Providing
impartial public service broadcasting in the United Kingdom, Isle of Man, and
the Channel Islands is its main responsibility. Funds are generated through its
profit-making activities and from the levy of TV license fees. BBC Trust
supervises BBC and its management is not intervened by government.
Why
was it high risk and why did it fail?
Coming out as
inflexible and bureaucratic became the main risk factors for the company. BBCs
choice of adapting as a commissioning model showed that BBC is less of the
programmer and more of the designer of programs made by independent production
house, which has been seen in recent years. Though, these two differs in terms
of skills and structural culture.
“Inbuilt Creativity” is
one of the many advantages that BBC possessed, but the essential element
started to reduce and became marginalized. Characterized by strong values
surrounding the public service ethos, BBC has always been traditionally run
under a hierarchical and bureaucratic structure. Also, the carry outs were also
been changed regularly. Eventually, BBC was revealing to be lacking of customer
focus, elitist and more importantly expensive. The criticism forced BBC to
perform an Organizational reorganization comprising the authorization of a
commissioning form. This move resulted in loss of key talents from many useful
functional areas of the firm.
There occurred the
situations where the commissioning model were in dilemma on broadcasting the
types of programs that the viewers would like. There was a clear threat for the
firm from other competitor 200+ channels for their survival. It was a really
big task for BBC to even survive in the competition but the increasing prices
of broadcasting costs and for new talents made it even worse.
Therefore, BBC can be
considered to be an example of an organization who embarked in a high risk
strategy that resulted in some sort of failure. It is a pure case of poor judgment,
and it couldn’t adapt itself with the changing demand and taste of its viewers
and couldn’t make proper strategies.
Reference:
About Wall-mart, [Online], www.usanfranonline.com › Online Education Resources accessed on 25th
March 2013
About Wall-mart, [Online], www.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/26walmart.pdf
accessed on 25th March 2013
About Wall-mart, [Online], www.perishablepundit.com/index.php?date=09/20/07&pundit=1 accessed on 25th March
2013
About Wall-mart strategy, [Online], zenith-consulting.com/research/walMart/Wal-Mart-Strategy.pdf accessed on 26th March
2013
About British Broadcasting Corporation, [Online], http://ivythesis.typepad.com/term_paper_topics/2009/09/case-study-british-broadcasting-corporation.html#ixzz2AuIDRkjN accessed on 26th March
2013
No comments:
Post a Comment